top of page

Beyond the Basics: 3 Hidden Traps in Military Retirement and Divorce

5 hours ago
4 min read


In our previous article on military divorces and retirement benefits, we discussed the fundamentals of how military pensions are divided in Washington State. We explained how military retirement pay is considered community property, and we clarified how the 10/10 rule governs how payments are distributed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).


However, simply knowing you are entitled to a

Military-style jacket behind a desk with a gavel and paperwork labeled THIFT SAVINGSS PLAN and ANNUAL STATEMENT

share of the retirement is only half the battle. Protecting that share from complex federal regulations and loopholes is where the real legal fight begins.


Military retirement division is not like a civilian 401(k), and standard civilian divorce documents will not protect you. If you are going through a military divorce in Washington, you and your attorney must be prepared to navigate these three hidden traps.


Trap #1: The Frozen Benefit Rule (NDAA 2017)


Before 2017, if a spouse was awarded 50% of the marital portion of a military pension, their payout was generally based on the service member’s rank and pay at the time of retirement. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2017 changed that landscape by introducing the Frozen Benefit Rule.

Under this federal law, the former spouse’s share is calculated using the service member’s rank and High-3 pay base, together with years of service, at the time of the divorce—not the time of retirement.

For example, if you divorce a Captain (O-3) with 10 years of service, your share is based on an O-3’s pay scale. If that person remains in the military and retires later as a Colonel (O-6), you generally do not receive a share of the financial increase earned after the divorce.

The legal trap is that calculating this frozen amount requires precise formulas in the court order. Generic language such as “50% of the retirement” may not satisfy DFAS requirements, delaying or jeopardizing payment.


Trap #2: The VA Disability Waiver (Howell v. Howell)


One of the most devastating surprises for a former military spouse is watching court-ordered retirement payments suddenly shrink or disappear. This frequently happens because of VA disability waivers.

Under federal law, a military retiree generally cannot receive both full military retired pay and full VA disability compensation at the same time, unless eligible for concurrent receipt. To receive tax-free VA disability compensation, the veteran may waive a corresponding amount of taxable retirement pay.


U.S. government documents on a desk with calculator, pen, folded flag, and official cap, suggesting finance or administration.

In Howell v. Howell, the Supreme Court held that state courts cannot divide VA disability pay as marital property.

If an ex-spouse applies for and receives a VA disability rating after the divorce, the divisible retirement pool may shrink. The former spouse’s DFAS payment can drop, and a Washington family court cannot simply order the veteran to replace it with disability compensation.

Possible negotiated protections may include indemnification provisions, an adjustment to spousal support, or a larger share of other marital assets such as home equity. The right solution depends on the facts and must be drafted carefully.


Trap #3: The One-Year Survivor Benefit Plan Clock


Military retirement pay does not work like a civilian life insurance policy or inherited IRA. When the retiree dies, retirement pay normally stops. If a former spouse depends on that income, Survivor Benefit Plan coverage may be essential.


A Washington judge can order the service member to maintain SBP coverage with a former spouse as beneficiary. But a court order alone does not guarantee coverage.

Under federal rules, the former spouse generally has one year from the date of the divorce decree to submit a deemed-election request directly to DFAS, together with a certified copy of the court order. This is commonly completed using DD Form 2656-10.

Many spouses assume the service member will file the paperwork because the decree requires it. If that does not happen and the former spouse misses the one-year deadline, the SBP right may be lost permanently.


Don’t Rely on Civilian Divorce Strategies


As we noted in our first article, military retirement cannot be divided using a standard QDRO. It requires a specialized Military Pension Division Order that complies with Washington law, federal law, and DFAS regulations.


When dealing with the Frozen Benefit Rule, VA disability waivers, and strict SBP deadlines, you cannot afford to work with an attorney who is figuring it out as they go.

Do you have questions about how these federal rules may affect your Washington divorce?


At Van Ackeren Law, we focus on the intersection of military regulations and family law. Contact us at (253) 442-6700 or cheryl@vanackerenlaw.com to schedule a consultation and discuss how to protect your long-term financial stability.


Key Takeaways


  • The Frozen Benefit Rule can limit a former spouse’s share based on rank and pay at divorce.

  • A VA disability waiver can reduce the retirement pay available for division.

  • SBP coverage requires timely action; a decree alone may not complete the election.

  • Military retirement orders must be drafted to meet DFAS requirements.


Protect Your Financial Future in a Military Divorce

Military retirement benefits require more than standard divorce paperwork. At Van

Smiling Cheryl Van Ackeren in a black blazer and pink top poses for a studio portrait against a warm brown-orange background.

Ackeren Law, we understand the intersection of Washington family law, federal military regulations, DFAS requirements, VA disability waivers, and Survivor Benefit Plan protections.


With experience handling the complex financial issues involved in military divorces, Cheryl Van Ackeren can help you identify risks, negotiate meaningful protections, and prepare orders designed to safeguard your future.

Contact Van Ackeren Law today at (253) 442-6700 or cheryl@vanackerenlaw.com to schedule a consultation.

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page